« "Image Upgrade" | Main | Anna Journey Finds New Sylvia Plath Poem »

National Novel Writing Month

Today is the start of the oddly-shortened NaNoWriMo, which is described on its official website thusly:

Valuing enthusiasm and perseverance over painstaking craft, NaNoWriMo is a novel-writing program for everyone who has thought fleetingly about writing a novel but has been scared away by the time and effort involved [italics added].

I honestly don't know how I feel about this kind of thing, so I'm going to relate a little story that a professor told me in undergrad. It goes like this: Three men go golfing. Two of the men are writers and know each other, one being the other's mentor.  The third is a heart surgeon, and is just meeting the other two.  They introduce themselves, but the younger writer is a little embarrassed to admit to a doctor what he does for a living, writing novels. He explains that he's also a college teacher and administrator.

The older writer says simply, "I'm a novelist." 

The heart surgeon has a lot of questions about the "writing life," and reveals somewhere around the ninth hole that he has always harbored a secret desire to write a novel.  "I have this great idea, and I have all the characters," he says.  "One of these day, I'm just going to take a sabbatical, rent a cabin out in the woods, and just write." 

The younger of the writers encourages the surgeon, and listens for the next few holes as he describes his idea for a novel.  He asks questions to let the surgeon know he's interested.  He offers him advice on how to get his novel published once he writes it.  The elder writer is silent during all of this.  The three men finish their game.

As they're parting and shaking hands, the older writer, suddenly very animated, says to the heart surgeon, "You know, I've always had this idea that I was meant to be a surgeon.  I think I'd be pretty good at it.  I have all the tools and drugs and stuff.  One of these days, I'm just going to take six months off, rent a cabin out in the woods, and just cut people open.  Just get in there and dig around!"

Of course, the heart surgeon is pissed, and the younger writer is horrified, but the older novelist has got his point across: writing is a profession like any other, like medicine, and requires more than enthusiasm and a little time.

Now, I'm all for encouraging people, especially young people, to go into writing as a profession, but if things like time and effort scare you, then it's probably not for you.  There are dedicated, hard-working people who spend their whole lives writing.  They live and die writing.  It is a respectable profession, and assuming that anyone with a little time and a fleeting interest (they said it, not me) can do it well is disrespectful.

There is a notion that art is easy, that art is a trick.  Not hard work or a career path, like real jobs, just throwing something together at the last minute and calling it "art."  Art is, in fact, a stunning amount of work, and time-consuming to boot.  It is not nearly as much fun as the NaNoWriMo website says it is:

We love the fringe benefits accrued to novelists. For one month out of the year, we can stew and storm, and make a huge mess of our apartments and drink lots of coffee at odd hours. And we can do all of these things loudly, in front of people. As satisfying as it is to reach deep within yourself and pull out an unexpectedly passable work of art, it is equally (if not more) satisfying to be able to dramatize the process at social gatherings.

If you're writing to show off how tortured or eccentric you can be, you're probably writing for the wrong reasons, and you'll probably lose interest once you realize the "fringe benefits" don't even come close to outweighing the "time and effort involved." 

If you want to write a novel, write a novel (and hey, November's as good a time as any), but don't imagine that it's easy, or that you'll take to it like a duck to heart surgery.  To quote NaNoWriMo one last time: "Make no mistake: You will be writing a lot of crap."

Posted on Wednesday, November 1, 2006 at 01:43PM by Registered CommenterMark Leahy, Web Editor in , , | Comments18 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (18)

I'll tell you what, though: if there were as many bad heart surgeries every year as there are bad novels published, we'd be in quite a stink.
November 2, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJames
God bless you Mark Leahy.
November 2, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterjsealy
The idea of NaNoWriMo is to get people writing. I dont know how anyone can look down on an event that is encouraging people to write, to just let loose and see what happens. It's literarary snobbery like this that taints the act of writing and takes all the fun out of telling a story. The idea of NaNoWriMo is to get people to stop listening to blowhards like you who say that only a select few can be writers, and to just write.
November 5, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Dishon
If you don't know how to write in the first place, it doesn't seem likely that you'll know how after spending a month writing a novel. Maybe writers would be better off generally encouraging the (correct) idea that it's very difficult to be a good writer, and most people can't do it. Most people are really shitty writers. Hey, I make a nice living off that fact myself.
November 5, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
(That said, NaNoWriMo isn't the problem itself--good writers will likely produce good material during it. If anyone is propagating the idea that the vast majority of what gets produced is worth anything beyond its value to the person who wrote it, though, that's unfortunate.)
November 5, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
The picture I get you saying is that no one should bother writing unless they're really serious and plan to take it up as a 'profession'. To earn money from it. To make it a primary career. Since when has this stigma for writing come into blossom? Why do people have to consider it seriously in order to contemplate attempting it?
NaNoWriMo is all about showing yourself what you're capable of in 30 days. And if it's the only thing you write then great, and if not then great, but it's fun. Nano is sometimes torturous but that makes it worth it in the end. "If you're writing to show off how tortured or eccentric you can be, you're probably writing for the wrong reasons" sounds like saying that torturous writing is non existent otherwise. What good would have the books be in the world if the writers weren't tortured at the time?
November 6, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterScarlett
What hubris. Writing is not brain surgery, and that's exactly why the whole parable doesn't work. That's why you can't just cut people open without knowing what you're doing. But you CAN write without knowing what you're doing, and that's arguably the best way to get better so someday you will know. If that's even what you want, apparently you can do it for fun or just for yourself. What a novel idea.
November 6, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterAnonymous
I fully support dissecting brains in your spare time too if you enjoy it (and come by the brains legally).
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
Steve, your comment shows the flaw in comparing creative writing to brain surgery. Surgeons go to school to study in order to start a career. How many writer's make a living off their writing? Writer's write as a personal thing, something they enjoy doing, like a woodworker would make a cabinet because he enjoys the process. People don't practice surgery in their studio early in the morning with a cup of coffee on their desk. Journalism would be a better comparison to sugery, because it is more of a career (in the fiscal sense) then creative writing is. And there is a structure, rules to follow, liek in surgery (inverted pyramid anyone?).

Mark's post seems to me to be lamenting that the products of everyone's novels at the end of NaNoWriMo (those that finish it anyway) will somehow hurt the literary community. These works are not going to be published you know, unless by a POD company. Very few NaNoWriMo novels get picked up by major publishing houses. So why the hostility? Doesn't NaNoWriMo offer some of the same things that an MFA does, which you defend? There's a community set up (in the shape of a forum, true, which is not the same as workshopping) and people can discuss each other's works. Writing 50,000 words of crap is surely at least good for the experience isn't it? Do people write that much for an MFA? There isn't as much thought put into NaNoWriMo (sometimes...there are many people who plan months in advance for this event) but it is practice at writing. So how can you defend an MFA program but look down on NaNoWriMo?
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn
I think it's great if you write part-time for yourself without training--it's just eminently silly to call yourself a writer at that point. If you do it full time even if you don't make a living at it, or it's a critical component of your profession (hello, creative writing professors!), or you have a non-vanity book or dozens of respected journal publications, then it makes more sense.

(Note that most people I know who woodwork solely as a hobby don't refer to themselves as woodworkers--witness my uncle the veterinarian, who's actually a very good woodworker but doesn't do it full time.)

I'm highly amused by your implication that creative writing doesn't have structure or rules, too. Hey, maybe I'm just biased because I'm actually able to make a living on my writing, so feel free to ignore my comments.
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
PS: I know I didn't say anything about MFAs, and I don't see anything about them in the original post, either. Unless you're referring to other posts on the blog, I'm not sure where you picked that bit up.
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
Sorry Steve, the second part of my comment was directed towards Mark. There was an ealier post he wrote defending MFA programs.

And I didn't say that creatiev writing doesn't have structure or rules, only that journalism would have been a better comparison since it is more structured in terms of an expected form for a news article. Creative writing has a lot more leeway that journalism doesn't, and that surgery doesn't.

Also I was not talking about woodworking as a career. I specifially likened it to writing for fun. I assume your unlce does woodwork because he likes it, right? I never put any emphasis at all on the term "woodworker" besides using it so you would know what I am talking about.
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Yes, thus my point: the same as with that distinction, there's a valid difference between "I write," which almost everyone can say on some level (and which is in itself a good thing), and "I am a writer," which too many people say. It's even more atrocious with "I am a poet," which I encounter an ungodly amount from hobbyists in local writing groups here (I assume it's more or less universal).
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve S
I understand that, but why does it matter if someone calls themself a writer or a poet? Why the elitism? Why can't the literary community be a community instead of a clique?
November 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Herman Melville wrote Moby-Dick in a month.
November 8, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterCasey Pratt
Wow, I'm 23,000 words into my NaNoWriMo-whatever, and just came across this discussion. I didn't realize I was being "disrespectful." To whom do I apologize for my thoughtless behavior of creating characters and seeing what they do? My rudeness of getting up at 5:30 (OK, really, 6) a.m. and writing before work as a reporter and staying up late after my kids go to bed?

Any advice where I can get permission to write fiction? Should I quit my writing gig and pay thousands to get an MFA, to make it all official?

Seriously: Who said or assumed anything about writing "well" during the month? At the end of the original entry, the, um, author glancingly acknowledges something that NaNoWriMo broadcasts loud and clear: what you write during the month probably will be crap. The idea isn't to write the Great American Novel or to loiter around coffeeshops and say you're a great writer; it's to give oneself permission to write. You perpetuate that same line of thought that holds people back. If you feel you must be ordained and stamped "approved" to be creative, rather than just have a love of storytelling and a way with words, hey, fine. I'm not here to piss all over your MFA. Just don't tell me I don't have the write to make up a character who goes around shoving scrolled MFAs up stodgy fundaments.

By the way, several published books, such as Francesca Segre's "Daughter of the Bride," have come out of NaNoWriMo. And I'm pretty sure she doesn't have an MFA.

Finally, I'm also fairly certain the compound modifier "oddly-shortened," in your first sentence, does not need a hyphen, "oddly" being an adverb.

So, um, NaNnyNaNnyBooBoo. That's right. I said it.
November 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDavid J
I meant "don't have the right," not "don't have the write." I knew I'd do that. That's what I get for criticizing your grammar. The really funny thing: I have a masters in blog commenting.
November 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDavid J
David: Amen.

p.s. I thought you were trying to make a really bad pun. Which would have been funny.

November 17, 2006 | Unregistered Commentere

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.